Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21553 (KAR)

SRI SRINIVAS v. SRI M K THIMMEGOWDA

WP/23831/2022 · 2026-06-16

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29198 W.P. No.23831/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.23831/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O M.K. THIMMEGOWDA R/O DADDAMAGGE VILLAGE AND HOBLI ARAKALGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.R. SHRIDHARAMURTHY, ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. M.K. THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS S/O M.G. KRISHNEGOWDA R/O DADDAMAGGE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ARAKALGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTIRCT-573102. 2. SRI. B.T. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O M.K. THIMMEGOWDA R/O DADDAMAGGE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADV.,) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN OS NO.79/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALAGUDU AND ALSO IN MA NO Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29198 W.P. No.23831/2022 28/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN, HEAR THE PARTIES AND PASS THE FOLLOWING ORDERS. QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDERS DATED 23.05.2022 PASSED ON IA NO. I OS NO. 79/2021 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALAGUDU VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO THE ORDERS DATED 28.10.2022 PASSED IN M.A NO.28/2022 BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN VIDE ANNEXURE-B, AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE I.A. NO.1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN OS NO.79/2021 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALAGUDU & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition which reads as under: “The undersigned counsel representing the petitioner herewith prays that, this Hon’ble court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48