206(U) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-18492-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Murti Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to decide her appeal filed under Section 79 of Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that petitioner’s grievance, at this stage, would be redressed if Registrar General is directed to decide her appeal in a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel submits that respondent would pass speaking order within six months from today. 4. Learned counsel representing the petitioner agrees with the aforesaid arrangement. PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.05.29 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18492-2026 (O&M) -2- 5. In the wake of statements of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.05.29 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document