Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21548 (HP)

RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/1665/2026 · 2026-08-31

Bhupesh Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ram Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh CRMPM No.1665 of 2026 31.08.2026 Present : Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. CRMPM No.1665 of 2026 Applicant is a convict and is serving his sentence in case FIR No.9 of 2023, dated 25.01.2023, registered under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station Bhuntar, District Kullu. At present, the applicant is detained in Model Central Jail, Nahan (H.P.). Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, averments made in the application as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the delay in filing the appeal against conviction is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr.A.(C-DB) No._______ of 2026 [Cr.A.(C-DB) ST No.7509 of 2026] Be registered. Notice. Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, appears, waives and accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Admit. Record be requisitioned. List for hearing in due course after completion. CRMP No.______ of 2026 [CRMP ST No.7511 of 2026] Be registered. Applicant is exempted from filing typed/translated copy of Annexure(s) at this stage, subject to filing of the same within 7 days, as and when directed to do so. It is also clarified that illegible documents shall not be taken into consideration, unless typed/translated copy of the same are not placed on record. Application stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Bhupesh Sharma) Judge 31st August, 2026 (Pardeep)