Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21547 (HP)

RAM BAHADUR v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.PT/111/2026 · 2026-09-01

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:37104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.111 of 2026 In CWPOA No.1335 of 2019 Decided on: 01.09.2026. ________________________________________________________ Ram Bahadur ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondents & Others Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Mr. Jitender & Ms. Samriti, Advocates vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwa Deep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Vishwa Deep Sharma, Learned Additional Advocate General, accepts and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioner, Ram Bahadur, has come up before this Court seeking execution and implementation of judgment dated 03.12.2025 [Annexure E-1 passed by this Court in CWP No.1335 of 2019, titled Ram Bahadur v. State of Himachal 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:37104 - 2 - Pradesh and Others along with connected matters, whereby in terms of Para 9 of the aforesaid judgment, the petitioners were directed to make representation(s) for ventilating their claim for conferment of work charge status within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified/downloaded copy of the order and even though the petitioner had submitted a representation on 16.03.2026 [Annexure E-2], the same has not been decided by the Competent Authority in terms of the said judgment. 4. With the consent of Learned Counsel for the parties, this Court disposes of the instant Petition, with direction to Respondents/ Competent Authority to comply with the directions contained in Para 9 of the judgment dated 03.12.2025 [Annexure E-1] within a period of six weeks from today. 5. It is clarified that, in case the decision of the representation goes in favour of the petitioner, admissible consequential benefits, if any, shall also be released in accordance with law. 6. Needless to say that in case the admissible 2026:HHC:37104 - 3 - benefits in terms of the judgment are not released to the petitioner within six weeks from today, the petitioner shall have liberty to seek revival of the instant petition. In aforesaid terms, the instant Petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 01, 2026 [Shivender]