MD. IRFAN ALIAS IRFAN ANSARI ALIAS JIGAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4365/2026 · 2026-07-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21545 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21545 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:21674 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4365 of 2026
------ Md. Irfan @ Irfan Ansari @ Jigar (aged about 24 years), son of Md. Anamul Haque, resident of village –Mandai Kalan, P.O. –Reformatory School, P.S. –Lohsinghna, District –Hazaribag, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate
: Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.04 Dated- 22.07.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.26 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 21(b), 22(b), 27(a) & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 4 gram of brown sugar while the co-accused Bablu Kumar was in possession of 3 gram of brown sugar, which is also known as heroine. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the individual possession of brown sugar from the petitioner comes under small quantity while jointly with the co-accused person it comes under intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 09 of the bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused person has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 08.06.2026 in B.A. No. 4239 of
2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner
during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge N.D.P.S. Act, Hazaribagh, in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.26 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
22.07.2026
Sonu/