1 APHC010299302012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2184/2012 Between: 1. PENUMAKA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O PEDA VENKANNA @ JOSEPH, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O KAVULURU, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, W.G.DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. NALLURI MADHUSUDHANA VEERA VENKATA NAGA SATYANARAYANA, S/O NAGA PARAMATHMA SUBBA RAO, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O GANNAVARAM, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, W.G.DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Crl.R.C., against the judgment dated 02.11.2012 passed in Crl.A.No.48 of 2012 by the learned II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, W.G.Dist., Eluru, confirming the judgment dated 31.01.2012 passed in C.C.No.438 of 2009 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Jangareddigudem. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 3289 OF 2012 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail by suspending the judgment dated 02.11.2012 passed in Crl.A.No.48 of 2012 by the learned II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, W.G.Dist., Eluru, confirming the judgment dated 31.01.2012 passed in C.C.No.438 of 2009 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Jangareddigudem. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2184/2012 The Court made the following: Report submitted by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor be taken on record. The report contains death certificate of the petitioner namely Penumaka Nageswara Rao. It appears that the deceased petitioner was convicted by the learned Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Considering the fact that the petitioner has expired, no more orders are required in the instant Criminal Revision Case. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:30.03.2026 SSA