Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21544 (BOM)

SOMA SUNDARAM MAYAVAN ARJUN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/4453/2025 · 2026-01-13

Neela Kedar Gokhale

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ajit Pathrikar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4453 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4270 OF 2024 Soma Sundaram Mayavan Arjun ...Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Navkar Jain, for the Applicant. Mr. Mayur S. Sonavane, APP for the State-Respondent. PSI – Tukaram Mengal, Aarey Police Station, Mumbai, is present. CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. DATED: 13th JANUARY 2026 PC:- 1. By order dated 16th July 2025, the Applicant was enlarged on bail on certain conditions as imposed in paragraph 13 of the said order. Paragraph 13 (ii) directed the Applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court as one of the conditions of bail. 2. Mr. Navkar Jain, learned Counsel for the Applicant, requests that the Applicant be released on provisional cash p. 2 bail in the said amount as the Applicant’s relatives are unable to find sureties in the said amount and the Applicant is languishing in the jail even after the bail order was passed. 3. In view of the contention of Mr. Jain, the Applicant be released on cash bail of Rs.25,000/- and file an undertaking that he will provide one or two sureties in the like amount of Rs.25,000/- within a period of four weeks after his release, which shall be accepted by the Trial Court. 4. The Interim Application is partly allowed and is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)