2026:JHHC:21716 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.936 of 2024 ----- Haider Ali, aged about Mohammad Ishaq Ansari, Sakwar, P.O.-Labarpur, 71 years, Son of Late Resident of Village- P.S.-Latehar, Dist.- Latehar, presently residing at Mohalla- Amwatikar, P.O. & P.S.-Latehar, Dist.-Latehar. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.Mr. Prashant Kumar, Son of not known, the Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Jharkhand, office of Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. 3. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Son of not known, the Secretary - cum- Inspector General, Department of Registration, office of Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. 4.Mr. Shekhar Jamuar, Son of not known, the Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S.-Garhwa, Dist.-Garhwa. 5. Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Son of not known, the District Sub Registrar, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. – Garhwa, Dist. – Garhwa. 6. The Accountant General (A&E), Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi. … … Opp. Parties ------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Niraj Kishore, Advocate For the O.P. Nos.2 to 5 : Mr. Mithilesh Singh, G.A.-IV For the O.P. No.6 : Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocate ------ Order No. 17/Dated 22nd July, 2026 1. Mr. Mithilesh Singh, leaned G.A.-IV representing the O.P. Nos.2 to 5, has submitted that the arrears of amount has already been paid to the petitioner. 2. Mr. Niraj Kishore, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, has submitted that the arrears have been received by the petitioner. However, he has submitted that the pension is yet to be revised. 3. Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General, Jharkhand, has submitted that even the pension has been revised. 2026:JHHC:21716 2 4. Such submission has been made based upon the instruction/communication which he has received from the office of the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand, Ranchi showing the issuance of PPO based upon the revision in pension and gratuity. 5. Let the communication dated 20.07.2026 pertaining to Pension Intimation Memo and the Gratuity Payment Order be kept on record and the copies of the said memo be supplied to the writ petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact and the order having been complied with, as such, there is no need to proceed further. 7. Accordingly, the instant contempt case stands closed and disposed of. 8. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is entitled for interest over the delayed payment, as such, he is at liberty to raise the issue of interest by filing appropriate application before the concerned authority for consideration as per law. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Date : 22nd July, 2026 Birendra/