Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21532 (JHR)

LAHSAN GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6806/2026 · 2026-07-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21694] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6806 of 2026 Lahsan Ganjhu, aged about 48 years, son of Bhikhan Ganjhu, resident of Village Koilra, P.O. Dahu Nawada, P.S. Tandwa, District Chatra (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Adv. For the State : Mr. V.S.Sahay, Addl. PP 02 / 22.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.116 of 2025 instituted under Section 111(3), 111 (4), 308(4), 308 (5), 61(2), 317 (5) of BNS, 2023 , Section 25 (1-B) (a), 26, 35 of Arms Act, and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is an extremist of TSPC organization and from his vehicle, which was driven by the co-accused Pratap Ganjhu, arms and ammunition, pocket diary related to the account of the levy, pamphlets of the extremist organization and other incriminating articles were recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 12 of the bail application and the petitioner has been in jail custody since 30.05.2026 , as mentioned in para 14 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Latehar in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.116 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 22.07.2026 Smita/-