Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2153 (BOM)

NITIN EKNATH KADAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/967/2026 · 2026-08-19

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - aba965.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 965 OF 2026 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 967 OF 2026 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 966 OF 2026 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 968 OF 2026 Nilesh Nitin Kadam ….Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent Mr. Y. C. Patil, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for the State. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026. PER COURT : 1. Learned Counsel for Applicants in Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 967/2026, 966/2026 and 968/2026 makes a statement on instructions that the Applicants are arrested during the pendency of the applications and as such, nothing survives in the applications. 2. Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 967/2026, 966/2026 and 968/2026 stand dismissed as infructuous. 3. At the request of learned APP, list Anticipatory Bail Application No. 965/2026 on 29.08.2026, by way of last chance. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) dyb