Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21527 (PNJ)

RANJIT v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRWP/5507/2026 · 2026-05-27

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` 103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ranjit State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Sanjeev Vijaraniya, Advocate for Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. Prayer in this petition is to quash the order dated 07.04.2026, whereby the emergency parole applied by the petitioner has been declined. 2. Pursuant to last order, reply has been filed by way of an affidavit of Rai Sahib, Dy. Superintendent of Police, District Bhiwani. The same is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner is undergoing se being performed only because the petitioner has not been released on emergency parole. 4. In the reply filed by the respondent, it is admitted that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from ‘pituitary tu surgery. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP- Date of Decision: Vs. Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Sanjeev Vijaraniya, Advocate for Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is to quash the order dated 07.04.2026, whereby the emergency parole applied by the petitioner has been declined. Pursuant to last order, reply has been filed by way of an affidavit of Rai Sahib, Dy. Superintendent of Police, District Bhiwani. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner is undergoing severe ailment and requires surgery which is not being performed only because the petitioner has not been released on emergency parole. In the reply filed by the respondent, it is admitted that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from ‘pituitary tu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -5507-2026 (O&M) ate of Decision: 27.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondent ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Sanjeev Vijaraniya, Advocate for Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is to quash the order dated 07.04.2026, whereby the emergency parole applied by the petitioner has been declined. Pursuant to last order, reply has been filed by way of an affidavit of Rai Sahib, Dy. Superintendent of Police, District Bhiwani. The same is Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the vere ailment and requires surgery which is not being performed only because the petitioner has not been released on In the reply filed by the respondent, it is admitted that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from ‘pituitary tumor’ which requires immediate Prayer in this petition is to quash the order dated 07.04.2026, Pursuant to last order, reply has been filed by way of an affidavit of Rai Sahib, Dy. Superintendent of Police, District Bhiwani. The same is Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the vere ailment and requires surgery which is not being performed only because the petitioner has not been released on In the reply filed by the respondent, it is admitted that the wife mor’ which requires immediate RAJESH KUMAR 2026.05.27 20:53 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5507-2026 (O&M) [2] 5. In that view of the matter, order dated 07.04.2026, declining the parole of the petitioner, is set aside. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of six weeks subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate. The petitioner shall surrender back to the jail authorities concerned on expiry of six weeks period. 6. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) 27.05.2026 JUDGE rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2026.05.27 20:53 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.