Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21526 (AP)

KONDUR VENKAT BAVANI ARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14627/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010289352024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14627/2024 Between: 1. KONDUR VENKAT BAVANI ARUN KUMAR, S/O K VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O PLOT NO 26 CO-OP COLONY VISALAKSHINAGAR VISAKHAPATNAM 530043 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.M.PALEM P.S., VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN AND DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.M.PALEM P.S., VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN AND DISTRICT 5. GIRIDHAR REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED NOT KNOWN R/O H. NO 1003 RK NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT YEARS, NEL FONEWN 6. PAVAN SYLESH, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O 402, SIRI NIWASAM APARTMENTS 3RD LEFT, THARAKARAMA NAGAR ROAD POTIHNAMALLAYA PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN AND DISTRICT 2 7. PAVAN K NARAYANA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 8-1-86/12, 3RD FLOOR 0PP. SANKETIKA ENGINEERING COLLEGE GATE POTHINAMALLAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M L NEELIMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14627/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondents Nos.3 and 4 in interfering with money transactions between the petitioner and respondents 5 to 7 herein and calling the Petitioner to the Police Station as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, motivated, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction.…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. The present petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent-police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14627/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS