Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.4794 of 2026
Decided on: 31.08.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Braham Dutt
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K.Gupta, and Mr. Bonit Thakur,
Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioner seeks applicability of Jayanti Rathore and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition.
4.
Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWPOA No. 3103 of 2020 decided on 19.11.2025
2 a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 31, 2026
Judge R.Atal