Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21525 (AP)

Dommaraju Rameshraju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15204/2024 · 2026-01-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010297722024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15204/2024 Between: 1. DOMMARAJU RAMESHRAJU,, S/O OBUL RAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC COOLIE, R/O. DOOR NO. 10/7, DOMMARAJUPALLI VILLAGE, LINGARAJUPALLI POST, RAJAMPET MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. NARRA GUNA BHUSHANAMMA @ NAGA BHUSHANAMMA, W/O MASTANAIAH @ TIRUMALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O. DOOR NO.6-27, CHENGAREDDYPALLE, KARAKAMBADI VILLAGE, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. T. KANAKAMMA,, W/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.7-30/A, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, RAJIV NAGAR, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. ARIGILA MUNILAKSHMI,, W/O GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.0-0, KUKKALAVARI KANDRIGA, KANDADU VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. T. DEVA,, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC COOLIE, R/O. DOOR NO. 18-5-87, SAPTHAGIRI NAGAR, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RENIGUNTA POLICE STATION, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, KARAKAMBADI VILLAGE, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE KARAKAMBADI PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KARAKAMBADI, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. T DHANUNJAYA REDDY, S/O. TV. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 2-14, PENAGALURU VILLAGE, PENAGALURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. K NARAYANA SWAMY, S/O K. JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-14, PENAGALURU VILLAGE, PENAGALURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. K KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-14, PENAGALURU VILLAGE PENAGALURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue the order or orders direction more particularly one in nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent forced the petitioners and others to vacate their properties by sold to the 6th to 8th respondents for meagre price, is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and voilative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to pressurized the petitioners to sell their property to the 6th to 8th respondents for meagre price and not to vacate the petitioners from their house an extent of Ac.0-02 cents each with Door No.5-331, Door No.5-300, Door No.5-332, Door No.5-336, Door No.5-298, with assessment Nos. 6608, 6555, 6609, 6613, 6553 in survey No.548/3 of Karakambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, erstwhile Chittoor District without following due process of law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd to 5th respondents not to take any coercive steps pertaining the petitioners house an extent of Ac.0-02 cents each with Door No.5-331, Door No.5-300, Door No.5-332, Door No.5-336, Door No.5-298, with assessment Nos. 6608, 6555, 6609, 6613, 6553 in survey No.548/3 of Karakambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, erstwhile Chittoor District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SANAGA ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15204/2024 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent forced the petitioners and others to vacate their properties by sold to the 6th to 8th respondents for meagre price, is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and voilative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to pressurized the petitioners to sell their property to the 6th to 8th respondents for meagre price and not to vacate the petitioners from their house an extent of Ac.0-02 cents each with Door No.5-331, Door No.5-300, Door No.5-332, Door No.5-336, Door No.5-298, with assessment Nos. 6608, 6555, 6609, 6613, 6553 in survey No.548/3 of Karakambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, erstwhile Chittoor District without following due process of law, and pass…” 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged By T.Dhanunjaya Reddy -6th respondent, the petitioners were called to the police station for enquiry. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, the police found that the subject matter is purely civil in nature and therefore no crime has been registered against the petitioners. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15204/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 236 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 15204/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV