IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11431 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2014 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj ====================================================== 1. Sabeeh Sarwer @ Sabeeh Sarwar S/O Late Obaidullah R/O Vill.- Shisa Bari, P.s.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnia, At Present Panibag, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj. 2. Minhaj Sarwer @ Minhaj Sarwar S/O Late Obaidullah R/O Vill.- Shisa Bari, P.s.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnia, At Present Panibag, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj. 3. Zeenat Jahan D/O Late Obaidullah R/O Vill.- Shisa Bari, P.s.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnia, At Present Panibag, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj. 4. Rahat Jahan D/O Late Obaidullah R/O Vill.- Shisa Bari, P.s.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnia, At Present Panibag, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj. 5. Sohail Ghaffari S/O Late Shoyeb Ghaffari R/O Vill.- Shisa Bari, P.s.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnia, At Present Panibag, P.S. and Dist.- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Md. Ragib S/O Samir Uddin R/O Kachahari Basti Padampur, P.S.- Dighalbank, Dist.- Kishanganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, opposite party no. 2 and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 406, 417 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the informant submits that from bare perusal of the impugned order it is apparent that petitioners have been declared absconders and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11431 of 2026(4) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 process of Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has been initiated against them to ensure their appearance in the Court as such petitioners are not entitled to the relief of anticipatory bail (Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2012) 8 SCC 730, State of MP v. Pradeep Sharma (2014) 2 SCC 17, Prem Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar 2021 SCC OnLine SC 955). 5. Considering the aforesaid development, petition for pre-arrest bail of petitioners is dismissed as not maintainable. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T