Talupula Ramulappanna @ Ramulappadu v. Smt. Duvvu Lakshmi
CRP/876/2017 · 2026-02-17
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21514 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21514 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010293462017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 876/2017 Between:
1. TALUPULA RAMULAPPANNA @ RAMULAPPADU, S/O RAMU @ RAMU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 40-YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL. VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. SMT DUVVU LAKSHMI, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O GOLLA VEEDHI, NEAR WATER TANK, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. BODDURU SURYAKANTAM, W/O SANYASAPPADU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. YALAKALA SATYAM, S/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE. GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. MOSURU GOWRI SANKAR, S/O LATE NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. MOSURU RAMANA, S/O LATE NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2
6. BODDURU VENKATA RAMANA, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O RAMALINGAPURAM VILLAGE, CHEEPURUPALLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 7. BODDURU VEERANNA, S/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 8. BODDURU NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 9. BODDURU RAMANA, S/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL. VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 10. BODDURU THATA POTANNA, S/O LATE PAIDITHALLI, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 11. MOSURI GOWRI, W/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 12. BODDURU RAMANA, S/O LATE THATA @ POTANNA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 13. BODDURU KRISHNA, S/O LATE APPALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O LOGISA VILLAGE, GAJAPATHINAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the order and decree dated 30.12.2016 passed in I.A. No. 177 of 2015 in OS No. 22 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Gajapathinagaram
3
IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 1156 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No. 22 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Gajapathinagaram in pursuance of the decree and
judgment passed in OS.No. 22 of 2013 dated 30.12.2016, pending disposal of the above CRP, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 876/2017
ORDER:-
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 30.12.2016 in I.A.No.177 of 2015 in O.S.No.22 of 2013 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Gajapathinagaram.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. S.Manaswi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events, particularly as the parties have settled the matter out of Court, no further adjudication is required.
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and as the parties have settled the matter out of Court, no further orders are required. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
____________________________________
JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 18.02.2026 S D P
5
100 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 876/2017 18.02.2026
W S D P