Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2151 (JHR)

ANWAR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./715/2026 · 2026-02-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:3471 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 715 of 2026 1. Anwar Ansari, aged about 34 years 2. Dildar Ansari, aged about 32 years 3. Koushar Ansari, aged about 30 years 4. Majhar Ansari, aged about 21 years 5. Sajhar Ansari, aged about 16 years, All sons of Mannan Ansari 6. Mallika Bibi, aged about 59 years, wife of Mannan Ansari 7. Nushni Khatoon @ Nurani Khatoon, aged about 24 years, wife of Anwar Ansari All residents of village Bari Kalyani, P.O. Godda, P.S. Godda (M), District-Godda (Jharkhand) ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Manoj Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Advocate 03/ 10.02.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 198/2025 registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109, 76 of the BNS, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that occurrence is alleged to have been taken place on 08.11.2025 whereas F.I.R has been registered on 14.11.2025. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against the petitioners and in the impugned order injury has not been disclosed. He submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 13 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits ( 2026:JHHC:3471 ) that allegations of assault are there. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the accused persons, the occurrence is alleged to have been taken place on 08.11.2025 whereas F.I.R has been registered on 14.11.2025 and in the impugned order injury has not been disclosed. Further, the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 13 of the petition. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Godda, in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 198/2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.10.02.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-