1 2026:CGHC:24129 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1649 of 2022 1. Kamla Prasad S/o Shivnarayan Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Pradeep Kumar S/o Shivnarayan, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Hemant Kumar S/o Shivnarayan Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 3. The Tehsildar Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Heeralal, S/o Nirmal, Aged About 50 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Umawati, W/o Ambikeshwar, Aged About 50 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 6. Rajmohit, S/o Nirmal, Aged About 52 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 7. Jhandalal, S/o Nirmal, Aged About 48 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 8. Kunti Bai, W/o Nirmal, Aged About 70 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 9. Tara Bai, W/o Nirmal, Aged About 65 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Parri, Tehsil And District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 10. Muresh Bai, D/o Nirmal, Aged About 47 Years, W/o Heeralal, Caste Koir, R/o Village Sirasi, Tehsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 11. Annapurna, D/o Nirmal, Aged About 40 Years, Caste Koir, R/o Village Sawarava, Tehsil Patna, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Aman Upadhyay, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 3 & 5 : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, P.L. For Respondents No.4 & 6 to 11 : Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16/06/2026 1. Heard. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is an alternative remedy, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the Civil Court. 3. Learned counsel appearing for their respective respondents have no objection with regard to limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners. 4. Considering this aspect of the matter, petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha