- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29127 CRL.P No. 1013 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1013 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SURESH CHANDRA @ SURESH @ CITI BANK NAGARAJ @ BHASKARAN S/O EARANNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO. 277, 10TH CROSS, D-GROUP LAYOUT, LINGDHEERNAHALLI, ANDHARHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 091. 2. MOHAMMED JUNED @ JUNEED @ MAHESH POOJARI @ SHIVAKUMAR S/O. SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RA/T NO.213, MARUTHINAGAR, 23RD CROSS, NEAR VIOLATINE MODEL SCHOOL, ITMADU MAIN ROAD, BANASHAKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU 85. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SHIREESHA S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SUBBA REDDY K N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY KUMBALAGUDU POLICE STATION, KASTURBA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAK, BANGALORE - 560 001. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29127 CRL.P No. 1013 of 2021 2. K.NAGENDRAPPA, S/O LATE VEERAPPA, MANAGER, MUTHOOOTTU MINI FINANCIERS LIMITED, MARIYAPPANAPALYA, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 059. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOUMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI BALARAM M.L., ADVOCATE FOR R2 - ABSENT) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S. 482 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN S.C.NO.194/2018 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.341,170,171,395, 342,120B, 364A, 201 OF IPC AND SECTION 3, 25 AND 26 OF ARMS ACT, COMPLAINT AND FIR VIDE ANNEXURE A, B AND C WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 THEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging proceedings in SC no.194/2018 on file of IX Addl. District and Session Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru for offences punishable under Section 341, 170, 171, 395, 342, 120B, 364A, 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29127 CRL.P No. 1013 of 2021 and Sections 3, 25 and 26 of Arms Act, 1959, this petition is filed. 2. It is seen that, petition is filed in year 2021, notice was ordered and there is no interim order. 3. To a query, learned counsel for petitioners fairly and candidly submitted that proceedings are at stage of evidence. 4. In view of above, since matter before trial Court has progressed substantially would not be appropriate for this Court to entertain petition under Section 482 of CrPC. 5. Reserving liberty to petitioners to urge all contentions urged herein before trial Court at appropriate stage, petition stands disposed of. In view of disposal of petition, pending application, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34