Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21501 (KAR)

N S KAVYA v. ARUN T G

WP/12298/2026 · 2026-06-16

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29329 WP No. 12298 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 12298 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: N. S. KAVYA, W/O. ARUN T. G. D/O. N. S. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 29, 2ND FLOOR, 8TH MAIN BINNY LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560040. NOW RESIDING AT: NO. 75, C P ROAD, MALUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 563130. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. NEERAJA KARANTH, ADVOCATE) AND: ARUN T. G., S/O T GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 102, SHARANAM 12TH MAIN, BINNY LAYOUT, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29329 WP No. 12298 of 2026 2ND STAGE VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560040. PRESENTLY AT: NO.29, 8TH MAIN, BINNY LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560040 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SIJI MALAYIL, ADVOCATE FOR C/R IN CP NO. 9020/2026) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING OF THE ORDER DATED 9/4/2026 PASSED ON I A NO. 11 IN MC NO. 69/2022 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALUR, FILED HEREWITH AT ANNEXURE- A, AND CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE I A NO. 11 IN MC NO. 69/2022 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR 'PART HEARD', THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29329 WP No. 12298 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Smt.Neeraja Karanth, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to produce the mobile phone in which the statements of the respondent with regard to material aspects were recorded. Permission as prayed for is accorded. The writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to produce the mobile phone. However, mobile phone produced can only be received as evidence by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Malur by following the procedure established by law. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37