- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28915 WP No. 11805 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 11805 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: CHANDREGOWDA S/O AMASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O AGASARAHALLI VILLAGE BAGURU HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. AMASEGOWDA S/O DODDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O AGASARAHALLI VILLAGE BAGURU HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATTANA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201 2. DHARMARAJU S/O AMASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O AGASARAHALLI VILLAGE BAGURU HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATTANA TALUK Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28915 WP No. 11805 of 2022 HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201 3. PRESIDENT MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZEN TRIBUNAL AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HASSAN SUB DIVISION HASSAN - 573 201 4. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COURT HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR, HCGP FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 05.02.2022 PASSED BY R3 THAT IS, THE PRESIDENT, MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZEN TRIBUNAL, AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HASSAN SUB DIVISION, HASSAN IN Hi. Na Ra 34/2020-21 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND ORDER DATED 13.04.2022 IN PASSED MAG/13/2021-2022 PASSED BY THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COURT, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN AS PER ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28915 WP No. 11805 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 15.06.2026 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed, which reads as under: "The petitioner respectfully submits that the Respondent No.1 herein approached the tribunal by invoking the Senior Citizen Act for seeking some reliefs. The said petition came to be allowed by granting maintenance along with other consequential reliefs. The said order was challenged by the petitioner before the appellate authority. Now, the Respondent No.1 Amasegowda who being the father of the petitioner is no more. Therefore, the petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the same, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the said memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE HDK