Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2150 (RAJ)

BUNTY SUMAN S/O SHRI MISHRILAL SUMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/562/2026 · 2026-04-13

Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15271-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Emergent Parole) No. 562/2026 Bunty Suman S/o Shri Mishrilal Suman, Aged About 99 Years, R/o Nohara Gali Devpura Bundi Now Confined At Central Jail, Kota Through His Father Mishrilal Suman Son Of Mohan Lal Resident Of Nohara Gali Devpura Bundi (Accused Is At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector And District Magistrate, Kota (Rajasthan). 3. Superintendent Central Jail, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Mr. Vinod Sharma Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 13/04/2026 This Criminal Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking emergent parole for a period of 15 days on account of medical exigency of his father. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his father has been referred to cardiologist for further treatment and therefore, the respondents be directed to extend him emergent parole for a period of 15 days. [2026:RJ-JP:15271-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-562/2026] Per contra, learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. The petitioner is undergoing sentence of life imprisonment pursuant to judgment dated 04.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1, Bundi in Sessions Case No.194/2021 upon his conviction under Section 302 IPC. A perusal of the material on record reflects that on an earlier occasion, he was extended 15 days emergent parole from 04.12.2025 to 18.12.2025 on account of illness of his father. The petitioner is again seeking emergent parole based on the Medical Board Certificate dated 13.03.2026 wherein, his father has been referred to the cardiologist for further treatment. His application for emergent parole has been rejected by the respondents vide order dated 19.03.2026 on account that from the record, it was not reflected that his father was suffering from serious ailment. We are in complete agreement with the reasoning assigned by the respondents and do not find any material on record to demonstrate that his father is critically ill and the petitioner is entitled the emergent parole again for a period of 15 days on this account. Resultantly, the Criminal Writ Petition (Emergent Parole) is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Gourav/12