DILBAG SINGH v. STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER CUM TEHSILDAR AND OTHERS
CWP/11684/2026 · 2026-04-21
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2150 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2150 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-11684-2026 Date of Decision : April 21, 2026 DILBAG SINGH -PETITIONER V/S STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER-CUM-TEHSILDAR AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Akash Lather, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. On the previous date of hearing, i.e. 20.04.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- <At the outset, learned State counsel is directed to have apt instructions from the quarter concerned, as to how much time is required by the authority concerned to decide the application preferred by the petitioner, specifically, when, as per para 11 of the petition, the matter was heard and reserved on 1.12.25. Adjourned to 21.04.2026.=
2. In compliance with the directions embodied in the hereinabove extracted order, the learned State counsel has today, on instructions received from the quarter concerned, informed the Court that the petitioner9s second appeal shall be decided within a period of six weeks.
DEVINDER YADAV 2026.04.22 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-11684-2026 2
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the petitioner9s second appeal within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) April 21, 2026
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.04.22 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment