1 2026:CGHC:24335 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 960 of 2023 1 - Dubraj Nayak S/o Shri Tilakram Nayak Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Tousir, Tah. Baramkela, District- Raigarh, District : Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd. Bilaspur Division 1st Floor, Regional Drug Warehouse Campus, Sendri, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Superintendent Engineer Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd. Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Block Medical Officer Primary Health Centre, Baramkela, Raigarh, Now, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - The Sub Divisional Officer Sarangarh District Raigarh Now, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Tahsildar Barmakela, Tahsil Baramkela, Raigarh, Now, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Mr. Martand Patel S/o Shri Uday Singh R/o Village Tousir, Tahsil Baramkela, Raigarh, Now, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Gram Panchayat Tousir Through Sarpanch, Mr. Ashok Agrawal S/o Shri Kishan Chand Agrawal, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Tousir, R/o Village Tousir, Tahsil Baramkela, District- Raigarh Now, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, G.A. For Respondent No. 9 : Ms. Shruti Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/06/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records of the petitioner's case from the court below. 10.2 That the Hon'ble Court may be further pleased to direct the Respondents authorities not to construct of 6 bedded Wards SHC Tausir Block Baramkela Distt. 3 Raigarh near the residential house and shops of the petitioner. 10.3 That the Hon'ble Court may be further pleased to direct the Respondent Tahsildar Baramkela to consider and decide the representation regarding to stop the construction work near the residential house of the petitioner within short period. 10.4 Any other order that the Hon'ble Court deems fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case be also passed 10.5 That the cost of the petition be also awarded to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat