APHC010292992023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3269/2023 Between: 1. DR IQBAL HYDER, S/O B. HUSSAIN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SCIENCE GARIVIDI, VIZIANAGAR AM DIST., ANDHRA PRADESH - 535101. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR V PADMANABHA REDDY, VICE CHANCELLPR, SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY DR. YSR BHAVAN, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 502 2. DR K VEERA BRAHMAIAH, DEAN, VETERINARY FACULTY SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY DR. YSR BHAVAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 502 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents u/s 10, 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Art. 215 of Indian Constitution for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 22688 of 2020 dated 06- 01-2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. R CHANDRA REDDY 2. VADAPALLI RAMESH The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3269/2023 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.01.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22688 of 2020. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, pursuant to the Form-1 notice issued by this Court dated 26.02.2026, respondent Nos.1 and 2 appeared before this court and pleaded that the non-appearance and non-filing of the counter- affidavit is neither willful nor wanton and pleaded that the order of this Court has been complied with. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 06.01.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22688 of 2020 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also confirmed the same. 5. In view of the specific pleadings made by respondent Nos.1 and 2, the appearance of respondent Nos.1 and 2 is hereby dispensed with. 6. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 243 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3269/2023 31.03.2026 TTPPSS