IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14845 of 2026 Decided on: 31.08.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roshan Lal Negi & Ors …..Petitioners Versus HPSEBL and Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K.Gupta, and Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners seek applicability of Jaffar Ali Vs The HPSEB Ltd and Anr.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation(s) for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWPOA No. 2662 of 2020 decided on 20.04.2026 2 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 31, 2026 Judge R.Atal