APHC010285882014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26702/2014 Between: 1. P.SAIBABU, S/O NAGA MALLESWARARAO, R/O D.NO.41-20/866A, LALBAHADUR STREET, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA-500 013, KRISHNA DISRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, TOURISM DEPT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide No.APTDC/Vigilance/04/2014 dated 18.8.2014, whereunder the petitioner was terminated from service, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently to set-aside the same, IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 33382 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 suspend the impugned order vide proceedings No.APTDC/Vigilance/04/2014 dated 18.8.2014, enabling the petitioner to continue in service as Deputy Manager in the 2nd respondent corporation, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 193938 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A K NARASIMHA RAO 2. SRINIVASULA REDDY VAJRALA SC FOR APTDC Ltd The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 11.02.2026 PNS