( 2026:JHHC:21675 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5333 of 2026 ------ Abdul Karim @ Karim Hussain, aged about 25 years, S/o Mujahir Hussain, R/o H. Road, Muslim Busti, Adityapur, P.O.+P.S. –Adityapur, District –Seraikella –Kharsawan, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.04 Dated- 22.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gamharia P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.358 of 2025, S.T. Case No. 108 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1), 61(2), 238(A) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons has committed the murder of the father of the informant namely Afsar Ali and caused disappearance of evidence of the murder. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because he called the deceased and went with him to the house of Md. Jamil Ansari @ Raju. It is next submitted that except suspicion, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused - Md. Jamil Ansari @ Raju has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.05.2026 in B.A. No. 3884 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.03.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 05 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Seraikella, in connection with Gamharia P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.358 of 2025, S.T. Case No. 108 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22.07.2026 Sonu/