Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010293832025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1433/2025 Between:
1. P. UMA MAHESHWAR RAO, S/O. LATE SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC HOSTEL WELFARE OFFICER GR-LL (RETD.), GOVT., BC BOYS HOSTEL, PYDI BHEEMAVARAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT R/O. H.NO. 14-65-27, OLD AGE HOME, COLLECTOR OFFICE ROAD, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. S SATYANANARAYANA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. DR A MALIKARJUN, DIRECTOR OF BC WELFARE, A.P., VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. SRI SWAPNIL DINKAR PUNDKAR I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (BCW), SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. NOT NECESSARY PARTY R3
4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, ANDHRA PRADESH,
STALIN CENTRAL MALL, M.G.ROAD, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA-2 R 4 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTU AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 29/01/26 IN CC NO-1433 OF 2025.
...CONTEMNOR(S): p. 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein, U/S 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their will full violation and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by his Lordships Honble Sri. Justice SUBBA REDDY SATTi in W.P. No. 18457 / 2024, dt 23.08.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 23.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.18457 of 2024.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 23.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.18457 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.02.2026 TVN p. 3 96 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.1433 OF 2025
Date: 26.02.2026 TVN