Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2148 (ORI)

BIPIN CHANDRA MANTRY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/4543/2026 · 2026-04-06

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.4543 of 2026 Bipin Chandra Mantry …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Swain, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 06.04.2026 1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to consider the above facts and circumstances, issue notice to the Opp. Parties directing them to file counter and on hearing from both sides be pleased (i) to direct the Opp. Party No.2 & 3 to sanction the financial benefits of 1st MACP to the Petitioner, payable to him under ORSP Rules, 2017 w.e.f 09.06.2019 in terms of Notification of Govt. of Odisha Finance Deptt. dated 20.09.2019 under Annexure-4 on rendering 10 years of service as VLW/PEO from 08.06.2009 with all consequential arrears, accruing to him in this respect within a time limit to be specified by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice; And further be pleased to pass any other order/s direction/s as may deem fit and proper for giving complete relief to the Petitioner; And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation before the Opp. party No.3 vide Annexure-11 to the Writ Petition and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider and dispose of the representation vide Annexure-11 to the Writ Petition, in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita