Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2148 (BOM)

HAYAT UMMED SING AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1596/2026 · 2026-08-20

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- NOB-6-BA-1596-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1596 OF 2026 HAYAT UMMED SING AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..... Mr. Sanket N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. D. Ghayal, APP for Respondent – State. ..... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 20th AUGUST 2026 PER COURT : 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for applicants submits that, during pendency of present application, charge-sheet came to be filed and therefore he has instructions to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court. 3. Permission to withdraw is granted with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court along with copy of charge-sheet. 4. In case, such an application is filed, the Trial Court shall decide the same, on its own merits. 5. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:37770