- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28113 WP No. 1053 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1053 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. WASEEM AKRAM S/O. ABDUL WAHEED, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.210, WAHEED DREAM GARDEN, CHANDANA HOSAHALLI, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, DABASPET POST, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 111. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. ARCHANA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S BUILDING, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28113 WP No. 1053 of 2024 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 561 203. 4. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562 123. 5. THE TAHSILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562123. 6. SMT. ARUNDATHI PRESENT TAHSILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 562123. 7. BENGALURU DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. OFFICE AT NO.2, GMC BANK CAMPUS PAMPAKAVE ROAD, CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU - 560 018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, R5; SRI. N. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28113 WP No. 1053 of 2024 DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 TO RESTORE THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY INTO POSSESSION OF THE PETITIONER AS THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN DISPOSSESSED FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY THE RESPONDENT ILLEGALLY AND HIGH -HANDEDLY BY ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 5 to restore the schedule property to the possession of the petitioner as the petitioner has been dispossessed from the schedule property. 2. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, since disputed questions of fact are involved in this Writ Petition as to whether the petitioner has been dispossessed or not which requires enquiry, and therefore, following the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28113 WP No. 1053 of 2024 case of STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Vs. U.P. RAJYA KHANIJ VIKAS NIGAM S.S. AND OTHERS reported in (2008) 12 SCC 675 and in the case of STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS Vs. M.K. JOSE reported in (2015) 9 SCC 433, the Writ Petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority for redressal of his grievances. 3. Pending applications if any, do not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9