Dr. K. Hemalatha, W/o. Dr. P. Satyanarayana v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
WP/13307/2013 · 2026-01-18
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21471 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21471 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010295692013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13307/2013 Between:
1.DR. K. HEMALATHA, W/O. DR. P. SATYANARAYANA,, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER IN CHARGE IN CHEMISTRY, IDEAL COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCE, R/O. 70-15-51, SURESHNAGAR, ENGINEERING COLLEGE POST OFFICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI-533003 ...PETITIONER AND 1.GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2.COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3.REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4.IDEAL COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE KAKINADA, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, SMT. P. CHIRANJEEVINI KUMARI, W/O. LATE P.S.SARMA, AGED 79 YEARS, R/O. KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceedings/charge memo dated 20.04.2013 by initiating disciplinary proceedings and also to hand over the charge to the Junior member of the Department as illegal, arbitrary and issue a consequential direction directing the 4th respondent to drop all further proceedings including the impugned orders pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16336 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order dated 20.4.2013 issued by the 4th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR EDUCATION 2.P SURESH The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.13307 OF 2013 ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned proceedings were suspended and that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation. Insofar as the petitioner’s claim for service benefits is concerned, the petitioner has filed WP.No.5716 of 2017, which is pending consideration. 2. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed in terms of the interim directions passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM
3 119 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.13307 OF 2013 Dated 19.01.2026 KGM