[2026:JHHC:21617] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6796 of 2026 ------ Law Ram aged about 32 years, son of Late Nandu Ram @ Nandu Verma, Resident of Village: DSP Road, Jawahar Nagar, Post Office & Police Station: Gumla, District: Gumla, State: Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-22-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 240 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(a), 22(a), 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin and from the co-accused - Vikas Pathak @ Netra Ranjan, 3.35 grams of brown sugar and from the co-accused – Nishant Sahu, 4 grams of brown sugar was recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because he was one of the associate of the co-accused. It is further submitted that though the petitioner was involved in one case but he has been acquitted in that case; so, at present, the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent; as mentioned in para-7 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.06.2026 as mentioned in para-23 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 240 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 22.07.2026 Saroj/