1 2026:CGHC:23969 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3949 of 2022 1 - Bindeshwar S/o Late Kunja Aged About 65 Years Cast Gond R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil Wadrafnagar District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rameshwar S/o S/o Late Kunja Aged About 62 Years Cast Gond R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil Wadrafnagar District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 3 - Jageshwar S/o Late Kunja Aged About 60 Years Cast Gond R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil Wadrafnagar District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 4 - Parmeshwar S/o Late Sunja Aged About 58 Years Cast Gond R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil Wadrafnagar District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The, Commissioner Surguja Division-Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh. VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 3 - Collector -Balrampur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 4 - Gurubachan S/o Late Ramvriksh Caste - Patwa R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil - Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Gururchan S/o Lae Ramvriksh Caste - Patwa R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil - Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Smt. Sushila W/o Late Ramvriksh Caste Patwa R/o Village Sulsuli Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State :- Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. G.A. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 16.06.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available under the law to approach the State Government/competent authority, as the matter pertains to allotment of patta. 2. Learned State Counsel does not oppose the submission so made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the aforesaid submissions and considering the nature of the dispute involved, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner 3 may be relegated to avail the alternative remedy available under the law by approaching the competent authority, which is empowered to decide the dispute in question. 4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority by way of appropriate representation/application. The competent authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha