CRWP-6437-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (122 ) SURAJ VERMA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and to take action on their representation dated 25.05.2026 ( 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 25.05.2026 before the Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula (Annexure P-7) raising their grievances but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 29.05.2026 SURAJ VERMA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and to take action on their representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-7). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 25.05.2026 before the Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula 7) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-6437-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and to take action on their 7). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 25.05.2026 before the Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6437-2026 Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on t disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speak accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 29.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, has advance notice on the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speak accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Commissioner of Police, District Panchkula to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without he merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.