Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21466 (AP)

SOMAROUTHU SIVA PARVATHI v. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14307/2024 · 2026-01-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010285752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14307/2024 Between: 1. SOMAROUTHU SIVA PARVATHI, S/O. SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 38, R/O. 42-9-371, MANGALDASNAGAR, 2ND LINE. NEAR VENKATESWARA TEMPLE GUNTUR. 2. SOMAROUTHU SAMBASIVA RAO,, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED 46, R/O. 42-9-371, MANGALDASNAGAR, 2ND LINE. NEAR VENKATESWARA TEMPLE GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THULLUR POLICE STATION, THULLUR, AMARAVATI. 4. THE HEAD CONSTABLE, THULLUR POLICE STATION, THULLUR, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in calling the petitioners to attend the Thullur Police Station, unless their presence is required for any cognizable offence and without written intimation and compelling the petitioners to execute registered deeds in respect of Door No. 2-55/2, Survey No. 131/3 of Ainavolu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and to settle civil disputes as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to police station and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in calling the petitioners to attend the Thullur Police Station, unless their presence is required for any cognizable offence and without written intimation and compelling the petitioners to execute registered deeds in respect of Door No.2-55/2, Survey No.131/3 of Ainavolu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and to settle civil disputes as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to police station and to pass ...= Heard Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that Petitioner No.1 is the daughter and petitioner No.2 is her husband and based on the complaint given by the mother of the Petitioner No.1, against the Petitioners and that there are civil disputes between the mother and children with regard to the subject matter, which is purely civil in nature and that Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and no crime is registered against the Petitioners and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 14307 of 2024 07.01.2026 Mjl /*