1 APHC010228272026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 13283/2026 Between: 1. KARRI VARA LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE K.V. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YRS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO. 26-2-4/5/FF 203, SRI RAMA KRISHNA HEIGHTS, CHINAGANTYADA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. KARRI VENKATARAMA NARAYANA, S/O. LATE K.V. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YRS, OCC. SALARIED EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 26-2- 4/5/FF 203, SRI RAMA KRISHNA HEIGHTS, CHINAGANTYADA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. KARRI SREEDHAR, S/O. LATE K.V. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 17-4-6, BUDDA RAMDASU STREET, GOWRI PARAMESWARI TEMPLE, GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP 2 BY ITS COMMISSIONER VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. APPA RAO BHEEMISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri V. Raja Manohar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Bheemisetty Apparao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Deputy City Planner, Gajuwaka Zone, GVMC dated 06.05.2026 along with certain documents. Copy of it is supplied to learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the grievance submitted by the Writ Petitioners under PGRS dated 29.09.2025 (Ex.P.1) had been addressed by the Respondents and they have issued an Endorsement on 13.10.2025. 4. Having noted the same, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to the Writ Petitioners to challenge the Endorsement dated 13.10.2025 and avail remedies as available to them under law. 3 5. Request granted. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioners to avail all remedies as available to them under law. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:07.05.2026 Vns