Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21457 (KAR)

CHANDRAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/128/2026 · 2026-06-11

E S Indiresh

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28228 RP No. 128 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.128 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE AVALAPPA, R/O.TIRUMALASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, SAMETHANAHALLI POST, HOSKOTE TALUK -560 067. BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. RAJACHARI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O.D.S.ESHWARACHARI, R/O.TIRUMALASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, SAMETHANAHALLI POST, HOSKOTE TALUK - 560 067 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. T.M.MUNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE MARIYAPPA, R/O.TIRUMALASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, SAMETHANAHALLI POST, HOSKOTE TALUK - 560 067 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28228 RP No. 128 of 2026 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, 4TH FLOOR, V.V.MINI TOWER, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, HOSKOTE TALUK OFFICE, HOSKOTE - 572 114 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK - 572 114, HOSKOTE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 5. VENKATESH, EX SERVICE MAN, PARA MILITARY FORCE, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O.MUNISHAMAPPA, R/O. TIRUMALASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, SAMETHANAHALLI POST, HOSKOTE TALUK - 560 067 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 6. KARUNODAYA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28228 RP No. 128 of 2026 S/O.MUNISHAMAPPA, R/O. TIRUMALASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, SAMETHANAHALLI POST, HOSKOTE TALUK - 560 067 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 7. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O.MUNISHAMAPPA, R/O. TIRUMALASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, SAMETHANAHALLI POST, HOSKOTE TALUK 560067 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1-R4, SRI.KESHAVA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R5-R7) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2023 PASSED IN WP NO.20395/2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - A AND ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28228 RP No. 128 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. I.A.No.1/2026 is filed with a delay of 782 days in filing the review petition. The reasons assigned in the affidavit accompanying the application cannot be accepted as there is no bonafide reasons to accept. 3. It is also to be noted that the review petitioners herein have been heard in the matter. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the petition as there is no error apparent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45