Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21457 (AP)

DHARMANA APPARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14673/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010290152024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14673/2024 Between: 1. DHARMANA APPARAO, S/O LATE SIMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURAL LABOUR PEDDA STREET, TEKKALIPADU VILLAGE JALUMURU(POST) JALUMURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, JALUMURU POLICE STATION SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, JALUMURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, TEKKALIPADU VILLAGE JALUMURU (POST) JALUMURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. THE SECRETARY, GRAMA PANCHAYAT, TEKKALIPADU VILLAGE JALUMURU (POST) AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 7. DHARMANA APPALA RAMANNA, S/O SIMMANNA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC.AGRICULTURAL R/O D.NO 1-40 TEKKALIPADU VILLAGE JALUMURU (POST) JALUMURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM 2 DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14673/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate writ order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of 3rd Respondent trying to dispossess the petitioner from the petitioner schedule property in Sy.No.94/10 for an extent of Ac.0.05 cents at Tekkalipadu village, Jalumuru Mandal, Srikakulam District with collusion of the Respondent Nos.4 to 7 by interfering in the civil dispute without any jurisdiction and without following the any due process of law is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art. 14, 21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere in the petitioner schedule property in Sy.No. 94/10 for an extent of Ac.0.05 cents at Tekkalipadu village, Jalumuru Mandal, Srikakulam District.…” 2. None represented on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that basing on the complaint of the 7th respondent, the 3rd respondent-police called the petitioner to the police station for enquiry and no crime has been registered against the petitioner, since, the subject matter is purely civil in nature. He would further submit that the police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14673/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS