Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./42263/2026 · 2026-06-29
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21456 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21456 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42263 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1124 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Yadav S/O Late Sachindra Prasad Yadad @ Late Sachin Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Bharpura Diyara, P.S- Sonepur, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vindhyachal Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 29-06-2026 Heard Mr. Vindhyachal Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 1124/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/ 26/ 35 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to be an arms dealer and used to sell firearms for 30,000 to ₹ 35,000 each. Five pistols have been recovered from the ₹ possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that he has one criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42263 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 antecedent in which he is on bail and he is in custody since
26.11.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the fact that five pistols have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T