1 2026:CGHC:23967 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2018 of 2022 1 - Bihari Lal Soni S/o Late Shri Khyali Ram Soni Aged About 77 Years Working As Social Activist R/o Darri Road Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 5 - The Sub Divisional Officer Rural Engineering Services, Korba Janpad Panchayat Korba, District- Korba (C.G.) 6 - Maniram Manjhwar The Then Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Shyang, Janpad Panchayat Korba, District- Korba (C.G.) 7 - Balmakund Rathiya The Then Secretary Gram Panchayat Shyang, VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 Janpad Panchayat Korba, District- Korba (C.G.) 8 - H. N. Singh Sub Divisional Officer, Rural Engineering Services, Jila Panchayat Korba, District- Korba (C.G.) 9 - P. Dungdung The Then Sub Divisional Officer, Rural Engineering Services, Janpad Panchayat Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 10 - R.P. Sahu The Then Sub Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Janpad Panchayat Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 11 - Chandra Gupta Chandel Technical Assistant, Janpad Panchayat Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr.Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G,A. For Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Kunal Das, Advocate For Respondent No.11 : Ms. Savina Agrey, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Seema Singh, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16.06.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by way of the present petition, the petitioner had prayed for a direction to the respondents to complete the construction of the Bharat Bhawan. However, it is further submitted that during the pendency of the 3 petition, the construction of the said Bharat Bhawan has already been completed. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition and the same has, therefore, become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha