Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21450 (CHH)

SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2595/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23941 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2595 of 2026 1 - Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited Through- Director Shri Pradeep Tiwari At Village Bhoorjhara Urla Industricla Area District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, At Paryavas Bhawan, North Block Sector -19, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Union Of India Through- Secretary Government Of India Ministry Of Environment Forest And Climate Change, At Third Floor Wayu Wing Indira Paryawaran Bhawan Jorbag Road Aliganj New- Delhi. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 2 : Ms. Ankriti Darro, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16/06/2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “1. That, in light of the fact and circumstances of the case, it is humbly prayed that the Court may kindly be pleased issue appropriate writ(s)/Direction(s)/Order(s) and quash the demand letter dated 17.03.2026 marked as Annexure P/1 and the opinion dated 29.08.2025 marked as Annexure P/2 and consequently direct the respondent authorities to take necessary steps and grant appropriate clearance(s) to the petitioner so as to allow it to expand its business in the interest of justice. 2. Any other relief/direction that the Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case..” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat