Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21444 (AP)

Byreddy Subba Reddy v. The Station House Officer

WP/12683/2019 · 2026-02-05

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010274802019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 12683/2019 Between: 1. BYREDDY SUBBA REDDY, S/O. CHINA KONDAIAH, R/O. NAGIREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONAKANAMITLA POLICE STATION, KONAKANAMITLA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ' ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOT- SECRETARIAT, VELAA. AUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. BYREDDY VENKAT REDDY, S/O. VENKAT KONDA REDDY, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGIREDDYPALLE VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.12683 OF 2019 ORDER: Heard learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the enquiry of the police reveals that the matter is of civil in nature and therefore, they did not interfere in the matter, and the petitioner was advised to approach proper forum for necessary redressal. Therefore, petitioner sent a notice to the respondents and a civil suit is pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagnedra Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that at this length of time, no orders are required in the writ petition, as cause is not survived for further adjudication. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.02.2026 PSK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 78 WRIT PETITION No:12683 OF 2019 Date: 06.02.2026 W PSK