Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21441 (AP)

SANKRANTI SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15051/2023 · 2026-01-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010292922023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15051/2023 Between: 1. SANKRANTI SRINIVAS, S/O. LATE ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.115-5-93, KALYAN NAGAR, BOMMARU COLONY, KONTHAMURU, RAJ AMAHENDRAVARAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT RAJ AHMAHENDRAVARAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOKAVARAM POLICE STATION, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SANKRANTI RAMYA DEVI, D/O. K. SOMESWARA RAO, RESIDENT OF MOLLERU MALLAVARAM KOTHAPETA,GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15051/2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or Direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling/summoning the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing to settle the matrimonial disputes with the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station and harass the petitioner to settle the matrimonial disputes with the 4th respondent.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.01.2026. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15051/2023 Dated.06.01.2026 UPS