Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2144 (ALL)

JITENDRA SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

WPIL/1194/2026 · 2026-05-05

Arun Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1194 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajiv Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Deepak Gaur, learned counsel for the respondent Gaon Sabha. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to ensure that the land of arazi no. 254, Village Sijwaha, District Jhansi may be vested in the Gaon Sabha as purchasers (i.e. respondent to.6 to 11) of the land of arazi no. 254, situated at Village Sijwaha, District Jhansi are the persons not belonging to the Scheduled Caste has purchased the land of the Scheduled Caste without permission of the District Collector." 3. The averment made in the writ petition and the relief claimed in it is in fact that the sale deed executed in respect of plot no.254 by persons belonging to scheduled caste category without obtaining requisite permission in favour of respondent nos.6 to 11 be held to be void ab initio . 4. Perusal of paragraph nos.18 and 19 of the writ petition shows that one villager Keshvendra has filed Case No.4 of 2024 before the Deputy District Magistrate, Jhansi under Section 104/105 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for cancellation of sale deed executed in favour of respondent nos.6 to 8, therefore, the petitioner could have also approached the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Kumar Shukla, Shivang Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Deepak Gaur Jitendra Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) appropriate authority under the aforesaid provisions of law to get the other sale deed declared void. 5. The present PIL for declaration of sale deeds to be void and land to be vested in the State appears to be privately motivated, rather than a petition in public interest. 6. As under Section 104/105 of the Code, 2006, there exists specific provision for declaration of sale deed executed by person belonging to scheduled caste category without obtaining requisite permission to be void, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority under the aforesaid provisions of law. May 6, 2026 Ashok Kr. WPIL No. 1194 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad