Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21437 (AP)

T JYOTHI NAIDU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13144/2019 · 2026-03-23

Battu Devanand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010285272019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 13144/2019 Between: 1. T JYOTHI NAIDU, T.JYOTHI NAIDU S/O. ANANDA RAO, 31 YEARS, OCC PVT. SERVICE, R/O. H.NO. 1-416, M.V. NAGAR, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDUR POLICE STATION, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. MR K ANVESH CHOWDARY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE 39 YEARS R/O. 1ST STREET, VANTIMITTA, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SMT K REENA, W/O. ANVESH CHOWDARY, AGE 27 YEARS, R/O. 1ST STREET, VANTIMITTA, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. SMT K SUSEELAMMA, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE 56 YEARS, R/O. 1ST STREET, VANTIMITTA, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 14.08.2019 and not even registering an FIR or causing any enquiries in terms of the Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of U.P, as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to take action on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 14.08.2019 and to register FIR, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd & 3rd respondents to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioner on 14.08.2019 forthwith by registering an FIR, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.13144 OF 2019 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous. 2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dated: 24.03.2026 TM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 13144 of 2019 Dated: 24.03.2026 TM