- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27723 WP NO.16033 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16033 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KAMALAMMA SINCE DEAD, BY LRS. SHRI. RAJARAMA S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA S. AND LATE KAMALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.7/14, POLICE STATION ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004. 2. SHRI. MANJUNATH R. S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA S. AND LATE KAMALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.37, 11TH CROSS, BHOVIPALYA, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 086. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.R. SATHISH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27723 WP NO.16033 OF 2025 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE TALUK SURVEYOR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 009. 5. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY (R.) NO.29/57, CHIMNEY HILLS, PIPELINE, CHIKKABANAVARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 090, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. ESWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. MANJUNATHA B., ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROPOSAL DATED 13TH MAY, 2024 BEARING NO.LND(Y)CR 58/2023-24 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4-TALUK SURVEYOR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK VIDE ANNEXURE-A; QUASH THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM BEARING NO. LND(N)CR-45-2003-04 DATED 20TH FEBRUARY, 2004 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT VIDE ANNEXURE-B; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27723 WP NO.16033 OF 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for petitioners has filed memo for withdrawal dated 25th March, 2026, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed. 2. Memo is accepted. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of disposal of the petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15