( 2026:HHC:36704 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1120 of 2026 Date of decision: 31.08.2026 Raj Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 13.08.2026 along with copy of office order dated 29.07.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to judgment dated 02.04.2026, passed in CWP No.3957 of 2026, the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-department by way of passing office order dated 29.07.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:36704 ) is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 29.07.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge August 31, 2026 (reena)