- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27373 WP No. 14955 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14955 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MADDURAPPA S/O LATE B.M. VASUDEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS. R/AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562107. 2. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O T. MARIYANNA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT NO.968/25, 13TH MAIN, PIPELINE, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU -560019. 3. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O PILLANNA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.227, YEMALUR VILLAGE AND POST, BENGALURU -560 037. 4. SMT. UMA DEVI. L W/O LATE B.V. KRISHNAN, @ KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 5. KUSHALA S/O LATE K.V. KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27373 WP No. 14955 of 2026 6. KAILASH S/O LATE K.V. KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.4 TO 6 ARE R/AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 107. 7. SMT. B.V. SARASWATHAMMA W/O A. VENKATARAMAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.699, 28TH CROSS 20TH MAIN, POORNAPRAGNA LAYOUT UTTARAHALLI, KENGERI ROAD BENGALURU - 560 061. 8. SMT. MANJULA D/O MUDDAMMA AND SHAMANNA, W/O GURUDAT, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NARASAPURA MAIN ROAD, BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE AND POST, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562107. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O LATE SAMPANGIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. 2. SRI. ADDAVEERAPPA S/O LATE SAMPANGIRAMAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27373 WP No. 14955 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 3. SMT. NAGARATHNA D/O LATE SAMPANGIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 4. SRI. HARISH S/O LATE SAMPANGIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 107. 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU -560 009. 6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R5 AND R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATED 24.03.2026 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE MEMBER, KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU PASSED IN - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27373 WP No. 14955 of 2026 REV. APPEAL NO. 801/2014 (CH-) WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents Nos. 5 and 6. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Rev. Appeal No. 801/2014 (Annexure-A), whereby the appeal was allowed and the matter was remanded to respondent No.5 herein with a direction to consider the impleading application filed by the applicants therein. 4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is seen - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27373 WP No. 14955 of 2026 that the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, by the impugned order at Annexure-A, has accepted the impleading application filed by the applicants and remanded the matter to respondent No.5 for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned order is only a remand order intended to facilitate a comprehensive adjudication of the dispute after hearing all necessary parties. Such an order does not call for interference in exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11